Law, violence, elimination and ...talking about.

 

The Other
And having Knowledge of....some...

is not conceived nor understood as a precise knowledge of the existence of concentration camps
Noticing what is happening there
what "they" do to inmates

And what's going on behind barbed wires.

THE Other is something different
something with a wider range, more specific and loose in the same time,
something hovering with warmth sympathy generosity listening caring over a group of persons on an abstract but non-metaphorical level hoovering in some kind over the individua,  soaking their mindset and transcending...

Just said with my shitty words - as a nazi-breed I do not have precise ideas about this (as my non-german / French / Switzer or. non.... family said having noticed the malsaine perverted negative background I am coming from))
This part of my personal life on the crossroads where general abstract ideas cut into any individuality is ...inconsistently and ridiculously bumped together

but as a Nazibreed, working on The Third Reich and some hidden ideas I pretend having got ( obviously lying, distortioning every word like an unfit reader, incompetent listener, and disloyal student) - I pretend having learned from and by my grandparents

One may say: (What possibly could a nazi have taught me rightfully ...?
 Wolfgnag Ritzel  forced me to read Cassirer Hönigswald and Diltehy in as quickly as possible saying something like: ‘There isn’t much time, but if you want, do it quickly...’

But wtf would one say, listening reluctantly, afraid of getting entangled in too much lies? What could a Nazi  have understood in reading Cassirer or Cohen...nothing but assimilated.... (My Jewish Berlin Interlocutor stopped and did not finish the sentence.... probably: bullshit - I must complete his silent judgement:..endgame in any sort of reliability...

Wtf what could my grandfather Wolfgang Ritzel have told me and what on a metaphysical as empirical level could he have known, so, in either one or the other way he could have transmitted ...some sort of...

(In any case way you must start with something in this dark irrational not-to-be- understood matter of absolute evil))

I started with this precise question: what did, what could have they known. in 1933 (About the sort of existential nothingness.. of the others political fate and civic inexistence, the nonprofessional hunger and exclusion...the beginning of the starving

And because of serious missing parts and missing links in and during the year 1933 I started with the Rise to power of my grandfather surrounding family.
The only comments I found were those written by my grandfather’s aunt to Haushofer. Dating back or -better - forth in the future to 1944 .

Haushofer pieces of information, at least, those written down on paper,which can be found in the Bundesarchiv come surprisingly from the same informant Trott zu Solz uses

I suppose there are not many who know who this is.
Depicted by the author Lauren Young - quoting her self-description - an academic and policy consultant in security and defense issues. lecturer at Yale University Establishing a backdrop background to for nazi ambition of Unity Mitford and speaking of the Clivedon Set
“Cliveden House remained a place of political intrigue even after the war”

Anthony Eden, whose political demise was linked directly to the Cliveden Set proclaimed “how terrible has been the influence of the Cliveden Set, ‘ while Harold Nicholsen, who famously stood up against the Munich Agreement, claimed that they were “a defeatest pampered group”.
The last meeting of the Cliveden Stet took place in the eve of the war during summer of 1939. Their agenda had been overturned by the inevitability of war. Ribbentrop, now the German foreign secretary, embarked on an early June weekend in 1939 on one of the last missions on beghalf of the German government in England. He sent as an emissary Adam von Triott zu Solz, a friend of Waldorf Astor from his Oxford days. Unknown to his hosts, he was sent in an inofficial capacity by the German Foreign Ministry to probe the group to see whatever there was any way to avert England’s entry into the war. Von Trott was in good companxy for such an inquiry...

Unfortuantely , Young is unable to give some more details about von Trott. Includig about the circonstances of his death . And the British network of his co- defendent James von Moltke.
Universities. Like Oxford

And. Gathering intelligence. Unusual like von Trott's reading of Franz Rosenzweigs Hegel interpretation
Is not part of the process of processing by Laura Lauren Young.
I confess not to remembering exactly her name but my oblivious temper is less offending than her narrative.

Adam von Trott zu Solz. Still a negative Nazi figure in Britain and obviously America by readers better informed than me.
Perfectly clear blurred hidden figures fading out into political insignificance by their own superficial weight and wickedness, consumed from the inside by their rotten substance. If not hung by some more superior moral forces coming out of absolut evil are just a kind of STAFFAGE for an intriguing wicked and perverted political system Paralyzed by NON-action.

I apologize for my inappropriate words..
I slut like to mix French and British words compiled and compelled by nothing and drawn by force to this end gap of civilisation. The concentration camp.

A very German obsession. Concentration camps

A kind of constitutional gap force violent
unfair
unrightful (sic) and unpleasant as well.

I should be careful if I would go more into family stuff.... But finally I am not in the position to do this, keeping in mind that my position is the weakest, most inferior to all possible theoretical standpoints - so I won't say much.

But even from the weakest position I am wondering why there should be only one possibility to interpret this coincidence.
Because from my point of view, there is a striking coincidence:
Haushofers Informant

And that of von Trott zu Solz

And the KNOWLEDGE of a kind of gap in the institutional power of the state over a greater part of its population by an existential “Right” of The Institution which is larger than the death penalty that is named by ...

My problem is there is also another coincidence and a third party taking position by interference..
Of course - If detailed reports are to be found in Haushofers restored controlled and much supervised papers then they should also exist in others. Archives..

and I found other papers in the archives of HAUER, a narcissistic nazistic German philosopher of religions befriended to Martin Buber.

And here, I do have a problem ....

My grandfather as a young student having read, by chance, too, a book of Hauer thought had not found it worth of much esteem. He wrote BULLSHIT in some engaging letters but then had send the book to his mother - about Religion God and

annoying
I wouldn't dare say
the annoying part of The Other involved into spiritual realm theological background and some of those funding fundamental themes. Of Being

Only somebody like huge philosophers dream of
but not me
I am far too shitty a person and won't dare think of or dream of absolut universal groundings ..

But I do still believe you don't put up areas to isolate and torture people and then speak of a kind of universal spiritual frame keeping them there. to say it as simple as this.

I could start with Levinas or Heidegger or one of my grandfather's choices:Walter Benjamin reading one of Johann Peter Hebel text's on antisemitic pogroms for personal use..
Unfortunately, I am not supposed to retell the analysis of Walter Benjamin. and or his intriguing exegesis of Johann Peter Hebels antisemitic tale.

What I could do would be
to start with war - Levinas
death - Heidegger
and torture - Hebel and Benjamin
and return to WAR with Heraklit and or Heidegger and or my grandfather's surprising cousin in-laws..

But I am weak in genealogy... even though every nazi should be able to tell them on three or four fingertips

About State and utterances
And About GENOCIDE

 

 

 

Yes - I do know that I am supposed to use very academic words.
I could refer to a writing ...a not-yet-to-be-called book BUT I do encounter so much interference while writing the text
and NO...there is no KI in my writing as long as I can prevent it
no automatic correction
I do need my words as shitty as they are
I do need my faults because they are mine even translating wrongfully madness

and my weakest counter... is to name it publicly...

 

 

The theological background is presumably only Christian and by this antisemitic in its purest sense, even in the difficulties of and with non-aryan Christian and the deduction to non-christians at all
The theological background of my grandfather has been violently faded out.

OR BUT hate helps a lot in distroying my efforts to rebuild a kind of personal puzzle

I was kind of / bit surprised not to find any in my family
because it took me at least seven years to find - and get access to
The papers of Hugo Schmidt, a pastor of the church of Brandenburg
tortured to death or murdered in the MOORExpress or by some other means in 1940

Hate tells me... ( French nodding now) This is only an inexistent truth nothing more than a lie

Better to read Walter Benjamin and Levinas and Derrida and Kafka about the hidden places of law and power and State Kojéve, Zizek and Lacan.

Santner. My own private Germany,1996

..."what manifests itself as the law’s inner decay is the fact that the rule of law is, on the final analysis, without ultime justification or legitimation, that the very space of juridical reason within which the rule of law obtains is established and sustained by a dimension of force and violence that, as it were, holds the place of those missing foundations. At its foundation, the rule of law is sutained not by reason alone but also by the force/ violence of a tautologous enounciation...

As Jacques Derrida has emphasized in a fine commentary on Benjamin’essay (i.e.Violence) Not Hebel...of course, nr) , the extralegal dimension of force. (.....to lay bare to postwar and postrevolution Weimar parlamentarians as W.Benjamins initial concern was - nr again)...can be subsumed under a more general notion of the performative structure of speech acts.

....it is, Benjamin suggests (and Santner, nr), this missing link. (At the origin of the symbolic capital circulation through it) pertaining to the emergence of instutions that drives the symbolic macxhinery of the law - for Benjamin, the paradigmatic institution - and infuses it with an element of violence and compulsion.

The Concept of THE OTHER and the constitutional frame of elimination

 I, Nataly Ritzel, doing some research about my ancestors
the implication of my grand grandfathers
the Implication of my grandfather's aunt and her commitment to Rudolf Hess, her bloody disloyality and some forms of being excluded from power without stopping to support Nazi- ideology...
my grand mother involvement in pedagogical intelligence

my grandfather's brother-in-law dying in concentration camp  and their supposed or their active participation in establishing the NS State
In short:Their willing contribution  and/ or their opposition and  possible acts of resistance

This - is just a hilarious question for all non-german readers  - because they know it there was no resistance at all and nothing similar to it.

Their relationship to "Jewish friends, neighbors, teachers and even more intimate: father-in-laws or godfathers taking on responsibility for German Fascists

It occurs - and this moment (of truth) is already very fragile
It occurs nevertheless because documents are documents are documents before you burn them

The frontier line between being fascist and being none
between being national-socialist and being non-aryan
existed so deeply so clearly
that you could trace the hands -  between them, i.e. the physical contact - the exchange the giving and the receiving of  answers
and the plight
the suffering
Both is deeply interwoven in my family’s network even when there are still lots of people denying something like a network existed.

The denial. of "what "we" are "  isolates me and makes my words ILLISIBLE
This kind of isolation also constitutes me as a subject paradoxically (translating mischievously  Judith Butler - her differentiation would be helpful- but I can't  work with her words If I am trying to cite or quote her, my computer is getting  attacked and everything is lost
So instead all I could do was think about the denial

the BLUR
and by doing so I have to follow the line of censorship even with all wrong torsions and other possible distortion popping up at every moment. Hate has come to know fascists better than they do themselves the shitty interaction via Computer can restart every day on point zero because hate hasn't enregistered any response at all, finally there is non and will never be: Fascists will always stand OUTside reasoning
every reason you might produce fades into nothing, creating a feeling of helplessness similar to speaking/connecting with someone suffering  Alzheimer disease...


Even if my words my research
is about Rudolf Hess or Hönigswald
The Führer’s Substitute or the Jewish philosopher
Martin Heidegger or  Karl Haushofer
The German philosopher and the German Geopolitician married to Martha Haushofer
Thinking about  the difficult situation of Karl and Albrecht Haushofer
their urgent tipping POint   in 1940 1939 or 1941…
Then Ascher or Cohen : The German professor after the war mayor or the Jewish philosopher, dead in 1918.

Thinking about The NAUMANN Juden , the paradoxical Jewish national-socialist Mouvcement

or even the teacher of Anne Frank
the director of the Montessorian association Jewish descent leading the organization from the Netherland’s underground

Is a perilous act.

In every moment  a kind of deep fake masochism intruding disfiguring my words my thoughts
T#es qu'une merde
Transforming Subjects

Of course, the idea of Germans being tortured for being revolutionary is historically speaking hilarious
The idea of a German combattant for the African cause could only be a blurred
phony preposterous Phainomenon. Self-indulgent biased  and in the long run serving nothing else than a mobile for jurisdictional prosecution:
Dying a horrible death in a  KZ - a concentration camp is what a German missionary deserved.
Even if I were to talk about anticolonialism and anti-imperialist movements  BEFORE  1933, the blur of Historical truth would wash out everything compared to African suffering compared to the Jewish Holocaust
Yet -it is not possible to speak of Comparison.

Whatever I could know - possibly know about German geopoliticians
from Rohrbach to Haushofer - and their possible connection to German philosophers form Husserl to Heidegger from Cassirer to Scheler.
Via my personal historical background was broken by the fact of being
OUTSIDE History.
(…my words have to be broken and even if I would dare to say the same as Masha Gessen I have to be erased in my own words.
Calling my self mad - as in Judith Butler analysis of Foucault (“The wrong doing - telling the truth”) does it constitue  a kind of legitimation  of our mutual discourse ? )


I doubt it, because the signs of concentration camps still are  MORE Valuable than anything else and I have here some of those horrible items in my possession,  taken out of time and history.
They look like a magical tool… taken out of time and suffering

The blurring - the devaluation is affecting the concept… of personality and or identity
Working on Hildegard Fath, the Führer’s substitute secretary, and what she could have known
Is affecting me: Writing about her makes me identical to her.

The German Heimtückegesetz here fits well:
HERE all of them have to be considered as WAR Criminals -  everybody is entitled to write this on my wall.
Thats great.  (But, hate - I would like to say  if you let me speak at least once-  you have omitted to think about devaluation - if you violate me, you're violating the access point to your own main argument.)

Denigration my research by using Deepfake
The Deepfae of being unhuman.

One of the main objections accusation against Germans , and especially in my case, against the members of my family
relies upon their presumed incapacity to see (in every day life)
to notice the suffering of others. But, The Suffering of THE Other

Is part of the invisible frontline, written in the institutional process of the New national-Socialist State
The frontline between someone creating the institutional frame
Of putting parts of the population out of the  legal system
Represents also the line to knowledge and  the possibility to look for solidarity.
Both is LINKED even in the process of creating a kind of legalized annihilation.

In Philosophical writing, THE OTHER is sometimes
Only sometimes -
To be found under the name of the “NON-I"

Something which I, Nataly, compare to negative conceptions Of  the “I”
Declining also The Self, Selfhood, or anything
Ascribable to a subject
Which could mean: easier to handle, to deal with, perhaps.
Negative Moments of Subjects
is one of the Family topics. From Hermann Ritzel to Edmund  Husserl bis Brentano

Then there must be is  some possibility to talk about double-faced personalities
as Haushofer, Martha and Karl and Albrecht

(I often heard hate say:
Cannot trust any  one of them
there are no innocents on the right side of the river Rhine
as there is no innocent person in Gaza…)

Being non-aryan or non-german constitutes not a single opposition, it breeds multiple choices.

But in my case and I have to say it, It comes near to STIGMaTA
Being a SLUT  rien qu’une merde
Something lesser than a mentally ill person and something quite worse:
I have to say it, because, if  I don’t do it,  I can be sure the next website is taken down. Words destroyed texts disappearing
Social devaluation is part of the process.

Thinking about nonhumans and those people without values
being genetically evil or born with indelibile hatred,  with hate in DNA
As it is written TODAY AGAIN In the newspaper world
let me look at today's military enclosures.
The usefulness of medical services for military intelligence.
( I think one can notice  the  fraccassed broken imagery of PURETY from medical care, linked to genetically rotten biases…. Makes the most minimal (which seems to be the most expensive of all manners) humanitarian ground simply  a tool for military  purposes…


It is NOT hilarious
to pretend,  there is a  necessity for research about German war criminals and simultaneously to find it consequential and logically right to humiliate the research about the biography and deeds of war criminals.

BUT taken the question seriously

If by any chance I could know something about fascist structures and fascist philosophy, I then should be able to narrate or demonstrate what I had learned about them, I should be able to tell what exactly I knew about ordinary Germans and what exactly a fascist KNEW about concentration camps and what I saw of it in an institutional frame…HERe The first CONDITION of  being a fascist should be fulfilled

so -
YES or NO

Do I have this knowledge or not ?
I should KNOW, from the time my grandfather was 20 years old in 1933, what he had known and I should even be able to trace his knowledge to other persons

But as an outsider, subject and object
To notneutral interventions, active and passive
as  fascist I don't have the right to complain. Nor do I have the right to suffer with those kept in under human circumstances. SOLIDARITY does not exist

To continue my work as somebody intrinsically implicated  and excluded
even If I wanted to "reflect". (If  there is anything like a processing or reflecting process  of anything like a trauma  or any kind of trauma education)  on family members and their "exposition" to KZs
by establishing a  documentation about my historical materials, by using the abundant literature about  and from survivors as Bruno Bettelheim, Jean Améry Simone WEill Simone Veil, Primo Levi, Imre Kertesz, Nelly Sutro, Helen Czapski-Holtzmann , Isaak Katzennelson (W. Biermann translated) Norman Frister, G.Didier Hubermann / Ringelblum Archiv Warschaer Ghetto archives…or Kounio or
(Many of those books my grandmother gave me to read, and grandfather the fascist philosopher wrote about them…)
 the question remains
is there any possibility to THINK about the mechanism. of elimination
Is there any possibility to think and to "CALCULATE" chances techniques means  ways orders systems of elimination?
AND The most disturbing question: is there any possibility of a conclusion to be made by an observer who is NOT OUTSIDE the situation but concerned ?

BUT INSIDE...

Bruno Bettelheim was one of those who have cleared the ground for this question to be asked..

Measurements of annihilation
based on comparison, using mathematics in a kind of existential design
And subjects are part of the calculation - beings even when they are but unseen, invisible.

and is still - to quote some of the most famous parts of Bruno Bettelheim's book "Aufstand gegen die Masse" a possibility to survive.
(( But Bettelheims pedagogical development is itself authoritarian (say wellinformed critics) and by consequences  to be disposed off.))

The idea of punishment and the problem of subjects being based outside any forms of legal protection or denied  any form of sustainability even in their most basic needs
relies still on the concept of a subject...not only of the concept of being  an enemy.

- if subject and sustainability have any significance in determining what a "subject" looks like which is, perhaps,  a pure philosophical linguistic grammarly question ( to use some .....Lancanian... some .... Cohenian..... words....?) The question what a "subject" constitutes has extremely political consequences and defines a living being in any existential circumstances..

I cannot see nor understand why destroying this analysis 

and silencing  authors, writers thinkers is considered  to be the new decent way of making  philosophy.
Even when I am talking about GUILT. Even a destroyed enemy does not create a heideggerian ground of theological existence.

The problem in the incongruity of terrestrial concepts of religion
metaphysical concepts mixed with  new forms of interpreting space
creates new double binds
And I, as a slut as a mentally destroyed person without any solidarity and support could find interesting in  analyzing in order to help understanding
why the politics of collective punishments have created only a kind of double background.






The book heftarot

17 Jitro
Jeschajahu 6,1 - 7,6 and 9,5-6
sephardisch 6,1-13