I, Nataly Ritzel, doing some research about my ancestors
the implication of my grand grandfathers
the Implication of my grandfather's aunt and her commitment to Rudolf Hess, her bloody disloyality and some forms of being excluded from power without stopping to support Nazi- ideology...
my grand mother involvement in pedagogical intelligence
my grandfather's brother-in-law dying in concentration camp and their supposed or their active participation in establishing the NS State
In short:Their willing contribution and/ or their opposition and possible acts of resistance
This - is just a hilarious question for all non-german readers - because they know it there was no resistance at all and nothing similar to it.
Their relationship to "Jewish friends, neighbors, teachers and even more intimate: father-in-laws or godfathers taking on responsibility for German Fascists
It occurs - and this moment (of truth) is already very fragile
It occurs nevertheless because documents are documents are documents before you burn them
The frontier line between being fascist and being none
between being national-socialist and being non-aryan
existed so deeply so clearly
that you could trace the hands - between them, i.e. the physical contact - the exchange the giving and the receiving of answers
and the plight
the suffering
Both is deeply interwoven in my family’s network even when there are still lots of people denying something like a network existed.
The denial. of "what "we" are " isolates me and makes my words ILLISIBLE
This kind of isolation also constitutes me as a subject paradoxically (translating mischievously Judith Butler - her differentiation would be helpful- but I can't work with her words If I am trying to cite or quote her, my computer is getting attacked and everything is lost
So instead all I could do was think about the denial
the BLUR
and by doing so I have to follow the line of censorship even with all wrong torsions and other possible distortion popping up at every moment. Hate has come to know fascists better than they do themselves the shitty interaction via Computer can restart every day on point zero because hate hasn't enregistered any response at all, finally there is non and will never be: Fascists will always stand OUTside reasoning
every reason you might produce fades into nothing, creating a feeling of helplessness similar to speaking/connecting with someone suffering Alzheimer disease...
Even if my words my research
is about Rudolf Hess or Hönigswald
The Führer’s Substitute or the Jewish philosopher
Martin Heidegger or Karl Haushofer
The German philosopher and the German Geopolitician married to Martha Haushofer
Thinking about the difficult situation of Karl and Albrecht Haushofer
their urgent tipping POint in 1940 1939 or 1941…
Then Ascher or Cohen : The German professor after the war mayor or the Jewish philosopher, dead in 1918.
Thinking about The NAUMANN Juden , the paradoxical Jewish national-socialist Mouvcement
or even the teacher of Anne Frank
the director of the Montessorian association Jewish descent leading the organization from the Netherland’s underground
Is a perilous act.
In every moment a kind of deep fake masochism intruding disfiguring my words my thoughts
T#es qu'une merde
Transforming Subjects
Of course, the idea of Germans being tortured for being revolutionary is historically speaking hilarious
The idea of a German combattant for the African cause could only be a blurred
phony preposterous Phainomenon. Self-indulgent biased and in the long run serving nothing else than a mobile for jurisdictional prosecution:
Dying a horrible death in a KZ - a concentration camp is what a German missionary deserved.
Even if I were to talk about anticolonialism and anti-imperialist movements BEFORE 1933, the blur of Historical truth would wash out everything compared to African suffering compared to the Jewish Holocaust
Yet -it is not possible to speak of Comparison.
Whatever I could know - possibly know about German geopoliticians
from Rohrbach to Haushofer - and their possible connection to German philosophers form Husserl to Heidegger from Cassirer to Scheler.
Via my personal historical background was broken by the fact of being
OUTSIDE History.
(…my words have to be broken and even if I would dare to say the same as Masha Gessen I have to be erased in my own words.
Calling my self mad - as in Judith Butler analysis of Foucault (“The wrong doing - telling the truth”) does it constitue a kind of legitimation of our mutual discourse ? )
I doubt it, because the signs of concentration camps still are MORE Valuable than anything else and I have here some of those horrible items in my possession, taken out of time and history.
They look like a magical tool… taken out of time and suffering
The blurring - the devaluation is affecting the concept… of personality and or identity
Working on Hildegard Fath, the Führer’s substitute secretary, and what she could have known
Is affecting me: Writing about her makes me identical to her.
The German Heimtückegesetz here fits well:
HERE all of them have to be considered as WAR Criminals - everybody is entitled to write this on my wall.
Thats great. (But, hate - I would like to say if you let me speak at least once- you have omitted to think about devaluation - if you violate me, you're violating the access point to your own main argument.)
Denigration my research by using Deepfake
The Deepfae of being unhuman.
One of the main objections accusation against Germans , and especially in my case, against the members of my family
relies upon their presumed incapacity to see (in every day life)
to notice the suffering of others. But, The Suffering of THE Other
Is part of the invisible frontline, written in the institutional process of the New national-Socialist State
The frontline between someone creating the institutional frame
Of putting parts of the population out of the legal system
Represents also the line to knowledge and the possibility to look for solidarity.
Both is LINKED even in the process of creating a kind of legalized annihilation.
In Philosophical writing, THE OTHER is sometimes
Only sometimes -
To be found under the name of the “NON-I"
Something which I, Nataly, compare to negative conceptions Of the “I”
Declining also The Self, Selfhood, or anything
Ascribable to a subject
Which could mean: easier to handle, to deal with, perhaps.
Negative Moments of Subjects
is one of the Family topics. From Hermann Ritzel to Edmund Husserl bis Brentano
Then there must be is some possibility to talk about double-faced personalities
as Haushofer, Martha and Karl and Albrecht
(I often heard hate say:
Cannot trust any one of them
there are no innocents on the right side of the river Rhine
as there is no innocent person in Gaza…)
Being non-aryan or non-german constitutes not a single opposition, it breeds multiple choices.
But in my case and I have to say it, It comes near to STIGMaTA
Being a SLUT rien qu’une merde
Something lesser than a mentally ill person and something quite worse:
I have to say it, because, if I don’t do it, I can be sure the next website is taken down. Words destroyed texts disappearing
Social devaluation is part of the process.
Thinking about nonhumans and those people without values
being genetically evil or born with indelibile hatred, with hate in DNA
As it is written TODAY AGAIN In the newspaper world
let me look at today's military enclosures.
The usefulness of medical services for military intelligence.
( I think one can notice the fraccassed broken imagery of PURETY from medical care, linked to genetically rotten biases…. Makes the most minimal (which seems to be the most expensive of all manners) humanitarian ground simply a tool for military purposes…
It is NOT hilarious
to pretend, there is a necessity for research about German war criminals and simultaneously to find it consequential and logically right to humiliate the research about the biography and deeds of war criminals.
BUT taken the question seriously
If by any chance I could know something about fascist structures and fascist philosophy, I then should be able to narrate or demonstrate what I had learned about them, I should be able to tell what exactly I knew about ordinary Germans and what exactly a fascist KNEW about concentration camps and what I saw of it in an institutional frame…HERe The first CONDITION of being a fascist should be fulfilled
so -
YES or NO
Do I have this knowledge or not ?
I should KNOW, from the time my grandfather was 20 years old in 1933, what he had known and I should even be able to trace his knowledge to other persons
But as an outsider, subject and object
To notneutral interventions, active and passive
as fascist I don't have the right to complain. Nor do I have the right to suffer with those kept in under human circumstances. SOLIDARITY does not exist
To continue my work as somebody intrinsically implicated and excluded
even If I wanted to "reflect". (If there is anything like a processing or reflecting process of anything like a trauma or any kind of trauma education) on family members and their "exposition" to KZs
by establishing a documentation about my historical materials, by using the abundant literature about and from survivors as Bruno Bettelheim, Jean Améry Simone WEill Simone Veil, Primo Levi, Imre Kertesz, Nelly Sutro, Helen Czapski-Holtzmann , Isaak Katzennelson (W. Biermann translated) Norman Frister, G.Didier Hubermann / Ringelblum Archiv Warschaer Ghetto archives…or Kounio or
(Many of those books my grandmother gave me to read, and grandfather the fascist philosopher wrote about them…)
the question remains
is there any possibility to THINK about the mechanism. of elimination
Is there any possibility to think and to "CALCULATE" chances techniques means ways orders systems of elimination?
AND The most disturbing question: is there any possibility of a conclusion to be made by an observer who is NOT OUTSIDE the situation but concerned ?
BUT INSIDE...
Bruno Bettelheim was one of those who have cleared the ground for this question to be asked..
Measurements of annihilation
based on comparison, using mathematics in a kind of existential design
And subjects are part of the calculation - beings even when they are but unseen, invisible.
and is still - to quote some of the most famous parts of Bruno Bettelheim's book "Aufstand gegen die Masse" a possibility to survive.
(( But Bettelheims pedagogical development is itself authoritarian (say wellinformed critics) and by consequences to be disposed off.))
The idea of punishment and the problem of subjects being based outside any forms of legal protection or denied any form of sustainability even in their most basic needs
relies still on the concept of a subject...not only of the concept of being an enemy.
- if subject and sustainability have any significance in determining what a "subject" looks like which is, perhaps, a pure philosophical linguistic grammarly question ( to use some .....Lancanian... some .... Cohenian..... words....?) The question what a "subject" constitutes has extremely political consequences and defines a living being in any existential circumstances..
I cannot see nor understand why destroying this analysis
and silencing authors, writers thinkers is considered to be the new decent way of making philosophy.
Even when I am talking about GUILT. Even a destroyed enemy does not create a heideggerian ground of theological existence.
The problem in the incongruity of terrestrial concepts of religion
metaphysical concepts mixed with new forms of interpreting space
creates new double binds
And I, as a slut as a mentally destroyed person without any solidarity and support could find interesting in analyzing in order to help understanding
why the politics of collective punishments have created only a kind of double background.
The book heftarot
17 Jitro
Jeschajahu 6,1 - 7,6 and 9,5-6
sephardisch 6,1-13
