Ich danke dem Verlag Zylogge sowie dem Archiv für Zeitgeschichte der ETH Zürich , dass ich gestern bei der Buchpräsentation "Rettung vom Totenwagen" von Katrin Schregenberger über udn mit dem KZ bergen-Belsen Überlebenden Peter Iczkovits und dem anschliessendem Gespräch zu seiner eigenen Recherche dabei sein dürfte.
https://www.zytglogge.ch/Katrin-Schregenberger-Rettung-vom-Totenwagen-978-3-7296-5149-4?c=812
Man sagte mir, Pastor Hugo Schmidt sei “Der lächerliche Mensch”.
Einer der Anlässe auf die dies besonders zuträfe sei sein Auftreten auf dem Reichsparteitag in Nürnberg 1936
Lächerlich, würdelos. Die Würde seines Pfarreramtes verletzend,
seine eigene Dignität und Honorabilität in Gefahr bringend.
Ich bin mir da nicht so sicher.
Aber ich weiß auch, momentan wird dies heftigst von Journalisten der Berliner Zeitung vertreten, die “widerlichen Morallehren” der Nazigroßeltern tunlichts zu unterlassen seien.
Dennoch hätte ich da ein paar Fragen, vorallem an eine doppelbödige Moral der journalistischen ....Aufarbeitung.
Berlin SW 68.
Lindenstrasse 14
Bericht über Herrn Pastor Schmidt in Zehdenick.
Herr Pastor Schmidt ist Mitglied des NSKK und hat als solcher an dem Parteitag in Nürnberg in diesem Jahr teilgenommen. Ich selbst bin Ausbildungsführer der Brigade Ostmark und war als Mitglied des Stabes der Brigade bei der Transportleitung. Pastor Schmidt fiel uns schon auf dem Bahnhof Charlottenburg auf der Hinfahrt nach Nürnberg höchst unliebsam auf. Mit unnötigen Wünschen und Beschwerden belästigte er dauernd die Transportleitung. Er verlangte zunächst ein „Nichtraucherabteil“. Dies wirkte auf seine Kameraden höchst lächerlich, weil man selbstverständlich bei einem solchen Transport keinen Unterschied der Abteile machen kann. Ferner hatte er sich ohne unser Wissen sein Fahrrad eingeschmuggelt und im Gepäckwagen abgegeben. Wie er das fertig bekommen hat, ist uns heute noch unerklärlich. Wir Führer kamen bald zur Überzeugung, daß Pastor Schmidt irgendwie krank sein müsste. Es war für uns ausgeschlossen, dass einer, der dem geistlichen Stande angehörte, sonst so hätte handeln können. Schmidt war über die Grenzen des Brigadezeltes bald als „der verrückte Pastor“ im ganzen Lager bekannt. Er war die ganze Zeit hindurch der Gesprächsstoff des Lagers. leider sahen viele Kameraden in ihm einen Pfarrer und Vertreter der Kirche, sodass er dann häufig Anlass gab zu Stellungnahme gegen Pfarrerschaft und Kirche. Es ist unmöglich, alle Vorkommnisse genau aufzuzählen. ich will nur einige herausnehmen. Als wir zur Zeppelinwiese marschierten, um den Vorführungen der Wehrmacht beizuwohnen, trat Schmidt nicht an. Unterwegs fuhr er dann winkend mit seinem Rade an unserer marschierenden Kolonne vorbei. Nur durch unser Einschreiten wurde verhütet, dass Schmidt von unseren Männern vom Fahrrad gerissen und auf offener Strasse verprügelt wurde. Zweimal habe ich an diesem Tage persönlich eingreifen müssen, da sich die Kameraden immer wieder zusammentaten und ihm auflauerten, um ihn mit mit dem abgemachten Schulterriemen einen tüchtigen Denkzettel zu geben. Es konnte leider nicht verhindert werden, dass die Lagerinsassen eine Art Umzug mit Musik mit ihm veranstalteten. Am Tage der Abreise erklärte er, dass er nicht mit uns nach Hause kommen könnte. Er führe mit dem Rade und hätte noch wichtige Geschäfte zu erledigen. Wir machten ihn darauf aufmerksam, dass er doch zum Parteitag gekommen wäre und nicht in Nürnberg sei, um Geschäfte zu machen. Er fing an zu toben und wollte uns regresspflichtig machen, wenn wir ihn nicht fahren liessen, ja es sei von uns „Freiheitsberaubung“.
Rapport du
Limmeritz, le 20.10.1936
Rapport concernant le pasteur Schmidt de Zehdenick.
Mr pasteur Schmidt est membre du NSKK et en tant que tel a participé au Congrés du parti du Reich/ Reichsparteitag à Nurembourg cette année. Moi-même, je suis
et j'ai participé comme
Pasteur Schmidt se faisait remarquer inconvénablement dès le début à la gare de Charlottenbourg pendant l'aller vers Nurembourg. Avec des souhaits et des plaintes inutiles, il harcelait constamment la direction du transport. Il a d'abord exigé un « compartiment non-fumeur ». Cela semblait très ridicule à ses camarades, car bien sûr, vous ne pouvez pas faire la différence entre les compartiments dans un tel transport. De plus, il avait introduit clandestinement son vélo à notre insu et l'avait laissé dans le fourgon à bagages. Comment il a réussi à faire cela, nous reste encore aujourd'hui inexplicable. Schmidt fut bientôt connu au-delà des limites de la tente de la brigade comme « le pasteur fou » dans tout le camp. Il a toujours été le sujet de discussion du camp. Lorsque nous avons marché vers le champ de Zeppelin pour assister aux démonstrations de la Wehrmacht, Schmidt n'a pas concouru. En chemin, il est passé devant notre colonne sur son vélo en faisant signe avec ses mains. Ce n'est que par notre intervention que nous avons empêché que Schmidt fut été arraché de sa bicyclette par nos hommes et battu dans la rue. Deux fois, j'ai dû intervenir personnellement ce jour-là, parce que les camarades se sont réunis encore et encore et lui ont tendu une embuscade pour lui donner un bon rappel avec la bandoulière convenue. Malheureusement, on n'a pas pu empêcher que les détenus du camp aient organisé une sorte de défilé avec de la musique avec lui. Le jour du départ, il a expliqué qu'il ne pouvait pas rentrer à la maison avec nous. Il rentrerait à vélo et aurait encore des affaires importantes à faire.
Nous avons attiré son attention sur le fait qu'il était venu au congrès du parti et qu'il n'était pas à Nuremberg pour des affaires commerciaux. Il a commencé à se mettre en colère et voulait nous rendre responsables du recours si nous ne le laissions pas partir, ce serait une « privation de liberté » de notre part. Il aurait déjà envoyé ses affaires. Il aurait également envoyé son billet de retour – qui a été payé par la brigade – à la Reichsbahn pour être récompensé. Après toute ces actions individualistes égoistes ...., nous l'avions constamment observé, car il y avait un danger qu'il débande.Nous lui avons dit qu'il devait rentrer chez lui en toutes circonstances. Maintenant, il a commencé à jouer le malade et le déchaîné.
There is no liberation of Auschwitz.
Not for someone like me and not for the people I come from.
They merited punishment and they will forever merit punishment
if by any chance or disastrous circumstances
Or by their wicked evil mind
They had finished their lives in one of those death facilities
They have, I must admit, collaborated on their building:
The people I come from are linked to the Ermächtigung and by doing so - to the Establishment of NS State,which is linked to the date of The 30 January.
And - if I was allowed to explain to one of the listeners of BBC
Sunday night around 1 or 2 a.m.
In one of those German Tunnels
(Yes, I know, coming from me - it looks like an obvious disastrous and hateful mimicking of TUNNELS - But I do know - and I have some ideas about - why I am using it)
YES I would say: The Judgment and the day of the Liberation of the Holocaust, they are linked
A matter of PRINCIPLE.
(But as to the question if the judges had done it deliberately as the listener repeated twenty times - I could not possibly give an answer. (And yes, as you see my answer is already tainted by hate and antisemitism there could not be anything else)
And if the United Nations, The Court of Justice, The organizations of humanitarian aid
Are to be questioned to the ethical character of their motives
My relatives, my - being/me- ancestors would never ever had undertaken any kind of …relief…action…
There is no and there never was any kind of NO human - endeavor of solidarity, action or any kind of humanitarian goal.
Interrupting, halting or even documenting the atrocities..was none of their business
No general idea, no transnational undertaking, no more simple-minded individual conception of doing SOMETHING or anything against...
Only oneway straightforward committment to atrocity
I apologize for my despicable words but coming from one with a doglike mentality
A weak creature made by stumbling shitty words I do not have a correct idea of Auschwitz
(And I must confess I hate to claim some professionalism)
But I do think that the fact Auschwitz or Buchenwald existed
Is reason enough
to encourage any action any stopping atrocities anywhere
In any situation
Stripping others from being held innocent for being convicted is something that looks important to me.
And I do have a problem with seeing Heydrich in Gaza.
It does not look like it.
Even if I know Brunner is said to have lived to the happy end of his days in Syria.
I have difficulties to admit the rationale of retaliation one for 20 one for 200
A kind of blind rage is then coming out of me
Out of my darkness
One of those nazi words way of thinking
BUT developing this argumentation anyhow further is obviously suicide.
There is no liberation and none of theological reasoning.
Even on a theological basis, if it comes to a Christian faith
There would be ONLY antijudaic antisemitic and antizionist ideas and I try to listen carefully to jewish writers, artists, philosophers - my grandparents, my parents have taught me
Auschwitz is a place
here hate intervenes, I have some computational issues...word/pagesprogramm inetrrupted/ new words showing up...hate has it...reclaiming its presence..
a place that concerns every person, and all humanity
Auschwitz of which every country and every nation should have heard of
But, and hate interferes here, Auschwitz is a place which separation again is operating
Blood splitting
First, because all the knowledge I could have
There is nor was no compassion no timid reaching out to someone
No charity no human interest
because all the knowledge I could possibly have about death in Auschwitz
I t is supposed to be a fake one, a made up…like those German opportunists
Weak squeamish bleak disastrous and without any character
Invented, made up. Covering lies.
The people I come from would never ever invented some sort of “help” or knew much about "deuil" -
they would have been tooo weak and incapable. Loosers are for some reason. They did not really try…they are intrinsically biased -
even if it was a desperate moment for other people as for Werner Scholem, for instance.
When it comes then to protestant theology, the picture gets darker
as to the Switzerlands Humanitarian organizations or to Switzerlands Jewish organizations There is and was NO COMMON Ground.
This has to be set apart. Separated. Clearly and distinctively.
There is no Pasteur Trocme, there is no Christian or something from The Society of Friends
(In France perhaps they do believe there was one support)
Or even in Great Britain Bishop Cicestre
BUT
Nothing BUT.
Switzerland would never ever had been a place worth dreaming of
Not HEIDEN nor Trogen nor the Appenzeller Land
Small towns on maps but abyssal in their interior civic separation
With a deep mental separation line and phantasmagorical figures like Saly Mayer. Or Paul Grüninger
or Carl Lutz who - probably never ever existed - compared to Raoul Wallenberg but not his administrational counterpart and collaborator…
No consolation.
(Any form of so called humanistic consolation I could possibly be “proud of” , is fading out and
disappearing): The more it comes to responsibility the deeper the fall and the disgrace of this ‘abjection humaine’ as French readers would say.
If I would dare dreaming of Gisi Fleischmann
One of my nightmares
It would never be a kind of flower
To deposit on an imaginary grave
Hate intervenes. Pictures must be raped as well
My father reproached me - in a kind of deaf deafest conviction
To applaud the rape rapt sexual violence against the woman children and men of Israel.
It is difficult to correct my father publicly.
As a slut, inferior theological deprived creature I can speak with obscenity aroused and dumped in vulgarity, causing great harm and embarassment with my words on missing female, human solidarity.
Rape and liberation - this is something I could talk about
But it is difficult to link the terms of rape and liberation.
Like keys you’d rather smash someone in the face
Der nicht ging im Rat der Gottlosen
Translation
Translation when History ThOLOGY and Politics are mixed in,
is, with all its burden buried parts, complicated.
In my situation even more, because I am a profound unfit speaker improper thinker
and the feeling of language, its inner elegance and outmost originality, its taste, its depth and afterthoughts the subtelties between tongue teeth salive and melodie to paraphrase some of Nobokov's impressive masterpieces I love to keep them swinging swirled up discreet/indiscrete unfinished trailing...
(of course in a very limited way because I am motherfucker German and have as such a limited mind brain as some of my old French colleges love to remind me arrêtée arrierée I have to be limited in any way possible<)
In my situation I think better ...to keep things going on a slippery ground
more apt and likely to appear naiv, to be foolish than rigid in dignity.
Translation here is part of process, part of the historical procedure of RECONSTRUCTION which in itself seems foolish but not uninteresting - because World War 2 is still to be won if I am correctly informed.
Reconstruction therefore of some existing (or not) links between some Germans and some Not
part of the Friendship between Carl Theil Buber. And que cela vous déplaise de la traduction de la BIBLE la Scripture
and translation is at the heart of Montessorian pedagogy and Miussionary efforts in Africa
part of German Aryanization of French Publishers
and of course through the (very selfish) use I am making of those documents part of the whicked evil entreprise undertaking to pervert Europe or the world with German cognitive structure (Xavier Bordes).
Translation itself is here in my documents a kind of last resort against a very black deadly background.
Knowing that TODAY this kind of endeavor seems even more ridiculous
and the support from Jewish NOne because it looks like a second profanation
Translating Martin Buber Wrting into German and then Into French or English and then translating all back...looks foolish( even the protestant idea translating the SCRIPTURA is an empty IDEa: burning emptities)...
My problem here is the TRANSLATION of the first Psalm Psaume…for French People. (Unfortunaetly the world and especially the Human rights have been created in French and so for French reasons sometimes you have to be more than explicit) ON the Word COUNSEL
CONSEIL
"Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked"
"Heureux l'homme qui ne marche pas selon le conseil des méchants"
which, in my situation is a complete mess... Conseil could be something else.
An in this CONTEXT ...walking IN or sitting ON ...woudl mark a profound difference
And for the writer of a letter I want to translate: the word of CONSEIL Counsel ist not teh most important.
Probably du to some Gestapo Surveillance Background Context
Which is difficult to explain because CONTEXT is difficult word TODAY.
because you see, Foolish me, insisting on the Idea it would mean any Form of COUNSEL
BUT a precise One OBJECT: A GERMAN ONE.
With a very clear message.
So my WRITER if I may claim the person in question belonging to me and or for my project
The Writer of the letter focuses on walking into the Cousel. Or sitting on some kind of stone or bench..
Still, I admit, following my reading it is a State Conseil and that's a bit different
Because it is must be a State Counsel where the decision-makers are going to make a decision about LE SALUT, to put a French word in absolute denial of the German HEIL…because it is not for the Sake…but something else which is to be decided.
And thats just the point.
blessing for the people?
which also has to be eliminated.
google Translates:
Good for the people, which would also have to be eliminated.
Political issues concerning ELIMINATION of people In general or People tout court
are - in limited brain - tied to State adminstrations
or higher
perhaps an obvious misunderstanding of mine because for some other minor reasons I have to read Heidegger On State / Heidegger on Hegel
And, poor me, I do not agree with Mr Trawny or Maurer or some Americain Hegel Interpretes ... but this is mostly because of their unwillingness and ignorance to read deeper German on von Trott zu Solz.
The Redaction of the laws OF Blood and Breed …sorry..And Heideggers Unwillingness to discuss Blood and LAWs. In America tehy read antisemitic stereotypes where I do read mathematical sciences but wtf…I am a German reader thats for a lot of people already the dead bunch of dead souls nothing to read then). You can’t read as a dead soul than stare into blindness unfit to hear anything
As my nonfamily would say.
But anyhow - between darkness and deafness any parliamentary discussions could be interesting.
In my case for instance the problem is not mainly exclusion based on Blood and blood-pressure but the more basic principle of NOMOS or LAW.
HOW to exclude a huge part of the population.
What is exclusion.Which are measures taken up to install OR to prevent
Where are they decided
and for this reason some remarks in the letter I Tried here to translate or not to translate..... I'll skip… my audience is already bored to death
are interesting indications.... which I can slowly but hopefully fill with other documents ideas and indications from other members of........ family.
But the problem is not only HOW to translate CONSEIL
marcher DANS le conseil
ou être part du conseil, être membre du Conseil des ministres, par exemple...
ridicoulous difference without any importance...
but we could imagine some excluded people very unimportant b ut eager to learn more and especially how to get access to The INNER Circle ..?
You never had this idea... if I only could get in touch with the King... ...never? Ok ok dismissed the idea...
If the question or the important point this letter was written for, was only about .... to walk or to sit in the Circle Conseil des Mechants or Whicked and evil people.....
and the elimination of the entire population which seems quite exaggerated but not surprisingly today, which is...for a translator ...a bit difficult...
this time-based understanding
Because you see Time-based understanding ha sto come to light as well…
How to transform things in a more apt or actual …rendering recapitulation
Closing every possible debate of. sake Good Blessing…
And teh exclusion of Blessing or…äh…. Savety… as to
the problem of legal or illegal arrests. which are more or less even today something a political state quarrels with, useful or not, illegal or not , which out of a sudden got something way beyond human understanding
(A lot of difficulties here in redacting my posts..unfortunately I hve to mention all kind of absurd transformations of my writing because sometimes things appear as my saying which I would never have said...but police is without any support)
"Vergewaltigte" *
*der Sinn dieses Wortes fordert noch nicht die Tatsache der vollen Zerstörung, sondern sagt nur aus: Babylon (der Vergewaltigerin) ist jetzt selber Gewalt angetan worden, und daran schließ an die Rachepreisung für die Zukunft: Aber die Zerstörung( Persis griech. nicht gleichfalls mit Wortspiel Sinn im Griechischen)!
But this is Carl Theil in person… I will not translate, because this is the next post (If I don’t forget)
and I should give some more information about Carl Theil's letter, the circonstances he had written this particular letter and why he send it to Martin Buber.
In Germany I don' t have the right to talk much about CONTEXT
because Context means NOW (and is synonym with) denial of any possible genocidal practises...
Difficult to mention Context and Context so I thought it might be helpful to speak of a kind of Context 1 and Context 2 ...?
Context 2 would be - from my point of view - Martin Buber's then actual situation, then, on the first of November 1935 and the fact, established by his still existing edited volumes - that the printer had already got Martin Buber's translation of the sorry PSALMEN...SPRÜCHE...LOBPREISUNGEN and there was no need nor necessity for rewriting or redacting them...
But running through my old lines of translation...here some (minor ) translation of Carl Theil letter (a small part because the entire letter runs over several pages)...One translation by me the other by Google... unfortunately Grammarly is not running on this device...
Heureux l'homme qui ne marche pas selon le conseil des méchants. Qui ne s'arrête pas sur la voie des pécheurs. Et qui s'assied pas en compagnie des moqeurs...
Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers;
For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will perish.
Theil
Jena, 28.october,35.
Dear friend! Thanks for your letter! Some significant things I scarcely could say, so I had to keep silent, but nevertheless there are some points which are important and in particular at least referring to the first gospel i would like to let you know. for thsi i will join the first pages of my notes.
What bothers me most …what disconcert me most is the ongoing. throrough substitution of the word „sake“
good.
- through „happy“ twosyllables or three. twofold / threefold
blessed which occurs to me as having less impact less substance et therefore weaker and pale, but also with contrasting meaning …it is perhaps my personal discomfort only with this wording) But if it was to be said/set/placed, what I would accept with regret, then another line is still left: For the people’s sake
Good for teh people … blessing for the people?
which also has to be eliminated.
Dear friend! Thank you for your letter! I hardly have anything "important" to say, so I would probably have to remain silent, but there are some things that are important to me, and some of them, especially those relating to Psalm I, I would like you to at least know. I am therefore enclosing the first pages of my notes.
What bothers me the most is the almost continuous replacement of the succinct, pithy “Wohl” with the two or even three syllables “glücklich” and “blissful”, which not only seems to me to have less substance and therefore be weaker and paler, but also more ambiguously (Perhaps (I?) also personally have a stronger aversion to this word). But if it is to be used, which I only use
regret happened, then PS.89 p. 147? one spot left. Good for the people, which would also have to be eliminated.
This picture, I thought, might help raising some questions about PROOF.
Or EVIDENCE.
Most people don't think necessary to READ the text hidden behind this picture.
There is none and nothing of interest and if there were some individuals concerned by GESTAPO Letters, it is of no public interest anymore.
They would live through any form of hell...but they couldn't possibly be linked to "The Jewish State" nor to an jewish-arab "Friendship "or in any case LINKED to anything concerning Palestine.
Some personal belongings to late family members of my fascist family gone long time ago
some incomprehensible awful twisted situations
suicides on weddings broken fiancés and lies
mixing Geman Jews and assimilation
do ONLY concern RUBBISH.
Rubbish is not interesting.
There is no LOGIC INTO IT. Talking about German Concentration camps FROM THE INSIDE Of Germany is seen, from a philosophical background, and from a kind of INBETWEEN in the philosophical range of discussion considered as quite impossible.
(quote Tugenhat quote Wildenauer quote Heinze)
Even then it was up to the general conclusion "Germans are nazis and nazis do uncomprehensible things"
quote Simone Weil
all this would be nothing more than historical BULLSHIT.
Empirical stuff of some nazi people nothing more than a mindful dusty dirt, drying up all empathy.
Sometimes individuals stood up for general ideas and sometimes they are (destined) dooemed illfated) to be represented by those general ideas…
but wtf not in my case
Talking about MARTIN BUBER is just BULLSHIT
and a kind of unfriendly appropriation from my side (and if I ever got some support by the Jerusalem University is was based on fake and false assertions)
Talking about Hermann Cohen ist BUllshit
(as far one of my ultraorthodox Jewish comedian told me because they are.... kind of..... assimilation assholes. Which were not exactly his words…but ponctuated by silence I thought helpful to complete the underlying missing links)
Historical PROOF Is only interesting if it serves the Now transhistorical CAUSE.
It would be of general interest IF ONLY there was a kind of GENERAL IDEA
of how to use Mass Murdering, Trap and getting away with and so on....
The reason why I dare mentioning this GESTAPAstuff. (sic )
to farer extre..... Instrinsic en´xtrensic excentricities
following this dubious letter
are NOT to deny Mass MURDER
as most of my actual haters believe.
Mass murdering or going further “Admitting to accusations of genocidal cases” before the Highest International Courts...Those with the highest stakes. and the strongest exigencies are procedures
someone like me should approach in the most humble way possible.
And given the case that my weakest lies still need Years of sophisticated argumentation and elaborated documentation, they ought to be taken with the outmost caution:
Because as a genetical liar I am linked to every thing untrustworthy.
(Linked to the next philosophical burden, someone like me has to affront confirming the philosophical implications of people notexisting which means logically notexisting is as the equivalent of NOT Truth, not true...)
This kind of flickering untruthfulness describes very well also
The ones I have to deal with and the problem is …what is at stake here and concerns this shitty letter.
I admit having difficulties with my words…which is a problem of TRANSLATION…wtf…
The knowledge about concentration camps
And what was happening there in Buchenwald or Ravensbrück
Being there or not
Every possible thing someone knew about
even if
here Hate, interfering, pretends I should denounce myself as coupable even if someone could present the most accurate documentation about NOT HAVING BEEN in Baby Yar
Therefore still I Must be held RESPONIBLE IN PERSON says hate.
This is my moral obligation
and This is the question ...i would like to share with others. The reproach is on one side
what to do with it - on the other
and condemnation does not signify all, condemnation does not exhaust the meaning.
But: why should anybody be interested in figuring out old phony TRAPS of the Past
Catcxh set up by the GESTAPO
to lure more Notinnocent people into death...
as hate might say (because hate is innocent. and has the exclusive rights on the definition of innocence).
Forget Forgetting
Forget the words what is a trap...
and what could be the Utility
But it looks like …
I didn't even know that in the Third Reich and during The Third Reich practice of accusing opponents and people of different backgrounds (political artistical and biological...even if the latter is, in its definition and its jurisdictional sentencing complicated - even for Nazi administration and its lawyers)
holidays from KZ existed.
and what they are meant for.... what possible in doing then...being on holiday being on hold?
to be suspended
like the rhetoric of "hostages"
its incredible how the term of "hostages could be diverted...but nobody speaks against it..
when Mr Trump uses the word
or
the presumably assymetrical use of genocide accusation and the question why the International Law has IMPERATIVELY to be changed as the Berliner Tagesspiegel tells its readers NOW:
My family members deemed war criminals without accusation
or after appearing before the Nurenberg Trials
or never ever (which is considered to be a wrongful situation ( and will always be and for ever) if I try to follow my detractors correctly) should make the differenciation between the following dieffrend situations:
being held as a prisoner in a concentration camp
or being kept in a prison without any accusation
or being "hostage" as a convicted criminal
would necessitate a more detailed approach.
But as Haaretz or The Jerusalem Post or The Tagesspiegel - which are all much better informed than an irrelevant individual subject in Germany) wrote - it looks like this is rhetorically intolerable but difficult to handle and so, International Law is discredited.
The question who and which as subject should be concerned by any Changes or Proposed Changes made to International Law should remain and concern all of us:
because its possible OUTCOME is the one that affects even a piece of shit or a mentalyl ill person like me without a logic without any logical and without any substantial claim
(personally I think this is due to the obvious German hypocrisie talking about boycotting AFD but submitting then the same Rhetoric of Outsider Exclusion to other Topics)
Si I do follow the COVERING (Sometimes Iam wondering How any body could oversee this HEIDEGGERIAN USE Of UNcovering TRUTH) of this Mix ( I have not say "Mess") of political and juridictional consequences
But being held OUTSIDE
take off Talk OFF the Staatsbürgerrecht
or being PEOPLE
It seems to me difficult to understand ther "POLITICAL" changes as the former Director of Shin Beit
In Haaretz ....political ....or as PEOPLE... wtf...what an idea.
Mahwoud Bargain...sic
or addressing any comments on the LEGAL team of the other side because employing TERRORISTS and CONVICTED terrorists, is something reminding me of the past BUT I am not sure that after the slur and intimidation there comes a POLITICAL solution.
being hostage means you're always part of the evil process IN LAW
and we could stop here
because it is obvious that any progress being possibly made in NEGOTIATIONs
would always induce the evil part growing
The purpose OF TRAPS or hostages would nevertheless mean -to conclude my shitty argumentation or going back to its beginning -
You have to - if you want to READ or CONCEIVE or to set up a Trap that you have to adress the conception to an intended group of persons.
or at least have a group of persons in mind.
a subject to be attracted to....
in my case Hate knows and is certain as hell about German Fascist
Why should any german Fascist lure another one fascist into a trap?
Who could be a person of interest?
You don't care.
A group has to be ENEMY…or THE Other… there are no clutches of other ties…there is no solidarity no other impact
The Other
And having Knowledge of....some...
is not conceived nor understood as a precise knowledge of the existence of
concentration camps
Noticing what is happening there
what "they" do to inmates
And what's going on behind barbed wires.
THE Other is something different
something with a wider range, more specific and loose in the same time,
something hovering with warmth sympathy generosity listening caring over a group
of persons on an abstract but non-metaphorical level hoovering in some kind over the individua, soaking their mindset and transcending...
Just said with my shitty words - as a nazi-breed I do not have precise ideas about this
(as my non-german / French / Switzer or. non.... family said having noticed the malsaine perverted negative background I am coming from))
This part of my personal life on the crossroads where general abstract ideas cut into
any individuality is ...inconsistently and ridiculously bumped together
but as a Nazibreed, working on The Third Reich and some hidden ideas I pretend having got ( obviously lying, distortioning every word like an unfit reader, incompetent listener, and disloyal student) - I pretend having learned from and by my grandparents
One may say: (What possibly could a nazi have taught me rightfully ...?
Wolfgnag Ritzel forced me to read Cassirer Hönigswald and Diltehy in as quickly as possible saying something like: ‘There isn’t much time, but if you want, do it quickly...’
But wtf would one say, listening reluctantly, afraid of getting entangled in too much lies? What could a Nazi have understood in reading Cassirer or Cohen...nothing but assimilated.... (My Jewish Berlin Interlocutor stopped and did not finish the sentence.... probably: bullshit - I must complete his silent judgement:..endgame in any sort of reliability...
Wtf what could my grandfather Wolfgang Ritzel have told me and what on a metaphysical as empirical level could he have known, so, in either one or the other way he could have transmitted ...some sort of...
(In any case way you must start with something in this dark irrational not-to-be- understood matter of absolute evil))
I started with this precise question: what did, what could have they known. in 1933 (About the sort of existential nothingness.. of the others political fate and civic inexistence, the nonprofessional hunger and exclusion...the beginning of the starving
And because of serious missing parts and missing links in and during the year 1933
I started with the Rise to power of my grandfather surrounding family.
The only comments I found were those written by my grandfather’s aunt to
Haushofer. Dating back or -better - forth in the future to 1944 .
Haushofer pieces of information, at least, those written down on paper,which can be found in the Bundesarchiv come surprisingly from the same informant Trott zu Solz uses
I suppose there are not many who know who this is.
Depicted by the author Lauren Young - quoting her self-description - an academic
and policy consultant in security and defense issues. lecturer at Yale University
Establishing a backdrop background to for nazi ambition of Unity Mitford and
speaking of the Clivedon Set
“Cliveden House remained a place of political intrigue even after the war”
Anthony Eden, whose political demise was linked directly to the Cliveden Set
proclaimed “how terrible has been the influence of the Cliveden Set, ‘ while Harold
Nicholsen, who famously stood up against the Munich Agreement, claimed that they
were “a defeatest pampered group”.
The last meeting of the Cliveden Stet took place in the eve of the war during summer
of 1939. Their agenda had been overturned by the inevitability of war. Ribbentrop,
now the German foreign secretary, embarked on an early June weekend in 1939 on
one of the last missions on beghalf of the German government in England. He sent as
an emissary Adam von Triott zu Solz, a friend of Waldorf Astor from his Oxford days.
Unknown to his hosts, he was sent in an inofficial capacity by the German Foreign
Ministry to probe the group to see whatever there was any way to avert England’s
entry into the war. Von Trott was in good companxy for such an inquiry...
Unfortuantely , Young is unable to give some more details about von Trott.
Includig about the circonstances of his death . And the British network of his co-
defendent James von Moltke.
Universities. Like Oxford
And. Gathering intelligence. Unusual like von Trott's reading of Franz Rosenzweigs
Hegel interpretation
Is not part of the process of processing by Laura Lauren Young.
I confess not to remembering exactly her name but my oblivious temper is less
offending than her narrative.
Adam von Trott zu Solz. Still a negative Nazi figure in Britain and obviously
America by readers better informed than me.
Perfectly clear blurred hidden figures fading out into political insignificance by their
own superficial weight and wickedness, consumed from the inside by their rotten
substance. If not hung by some more superior moral forces coming out of absolut evil
are just a kind of STAFFAGE for an intriguing wicked and perverted political system
Paralyzed by NON-action.
I apologize for my inappropriate words..
I slut like to mix French and British words compiled and compelled by nothing and
drawn by force to this end gap of civilisation. The concentration camp.
A very German obsession. Concentration camps
A kind of constitutional gap force
violent
unfair
unrightful (sic) and unpleasant as well.
I should be careful if I would go more into family stuff.... But finally I am not in the position to do this, keeping in mind that my position is the weakest, most inferior to all possible theoretical standpoints - so I won't say much.
But even from the weakest position I am wondering why there should be only one
possibility to interpret this coincidence.
Because from my point of view, there is a striking coincidence:
Haushofers Informant
And that of von Trott zu Solz
And the KNOWLEDGE of a kind of gap in the institutional power of the state over a greater part of its population by an existential “Right” of The Institution which is larger than the death penalty that is named by ...
My problem is there is also another coincidence and a third party taking position by
interference..
Of course - If detailed reports are to be found in Haushofers restored controlled and
much supervised papers then they should also exist in others. Archives..
and I found other papers in the archives of HAUER, a narcissistic nazistic German philosopher of religions befriended to Martin Buber.
My grandfather as a young student having read, by chance, too, a book of Hauer thought had not found it worth of much esteem. He wrote BULLSHIT in some engaging letters but then had send the book to his mother - about Religion God and
annoying
I wouldn't dare say
the annoying part of The Other involved into spiritual realm theological background
and some of those funding fundamental themes. Of Being
Only somebody like huge philosophers dream of
but not me
I am far too shitty a person and won't dare think of or dream of absolut universal
groundings ..
But I do still believe you don't put up areas to isolate and torture people and then speak of a kind of universal spiritual frame keeping them there. to say it as simple as this.
I could start with Levinas or Heidegger or one of my grandfather's choices:Walter
Benjamin reading one of Johann Peter Hebel text's on antisemitic pogroms for
personal use..
Unfortunately, I am not supposed to retell the analysis of Walter Benjamin. and or his
intriguing exegesis of Johann Peter Hebels antisemitic tale.
What I could do would be
to start with war - Levinas
death - Heidegger
and torture - Hebel and Benjamin
and return to WAR with Heraklit and or Heidegger and or my grandfather's surprising
cousin in-laws..
But I am weak in genealogy... even though every nazi should be able to tell them on three or four fingertips
About State and utterances
And About GENOCIDE
Yes - I do know that I am supposed to use very academic words.
I could refer to a writing ...a not-yet-to-be-called book BUT I do encounter so much
interference while writing the text
and NO...there is no KI in my writing as long as I can prevent it
no automatic correction
I do need my words as shitty as they are
I do need my faults because they are mine even translating wrongfully madness
and my weakest counter... is to name it publicly...
The theological background is presumably only Christian and by this antisemitic in
its purest sense, even in the difficulties of and with non-aryan Christian and the
deduction to non-christians at all
The theological background of my grandfather has been violently faded out.
OR BUT hate helps a lot in distroying my efforts to rebuild a kind of personal puzzle
I was kind of / bit surprised not to find any in my family
because it took me at least seven years to find - and get access to
The papers of Hugo Schmidt, a pastor of the church of Brandenburg
tortured to death or murdered in the MOORExpress or by some other means in 1940
Hate tells me... ( French nodding now) This is only an inexistent truth nothing more than a lie
Better to read Walter Benjamin and Levinas and Derrida and Kafka about the hidden places of law and power and State Kojéve, Zizek and Lacan.
Santner. My own private Germany,1996
..."what manifests itself as the law’s inner decay is the fact that the rule of law is, on the final analysis, without ultime justification or legitimation, that the very space of juridical reason within which the rule of law obtains is established and sustained by a dimension of force and violence that, as it were, holds the place of those missing foundations. At its foundation, the rule of law is sutained not by reason alone but also by the force/ violence of a tautologous enounciation...
As Jacques Derrida has emphasized in a fine commentary on Benjamin’essay (i.e.Violence) Not Hebel...of course, nr) , the extralegal dimension of force. (.....to lay bare to postwar and postrevolution Weimar parlamentarians as W.Benjamins initial concern was - nr again)...can be subsumed under a more general notion of the performative structure of speech acts.
....it is, Benjamin suggests (and Santner, nr), this missing link. (At the origin of the symbolic capital circulation through it) pertaining to the emergence of instutions that drives the symbolic macxhinery of the law - for Benjamin, the paradigmatic institution - and infuses it with an element of violence and compulsion.
I, Nataly Ritzel, doing some research about my ancestors
the implication of my grand grandfathers
the Implication of my grandfather's aunt and her commitment to Rudolf Hess, her bloody disloyality and some forms of being excluded from power without stopping to support Nazi- ideology...
my grand mother involvement in pedagogical intelligence
my grandfather's brother-in-law dying in concentration camp and their supposed or their active participation in establishing the NS State
In short:Their willing contribution and/ or their opposition and possible acts of resistance
This - is just a hilarious question for all non-german readers - because they know it there was no resistance at all and nothing similar to it.
Their relationship to "Jewish friends, neighbors, teachers and even more intimate: father-in-laws or godfathers taking on responsibility for German Fascists
It occurs - and this moment (of truth) is already very fragile
It occurs nevertheless because documents are documents are documents before you burn them
The frontier line between being fascist and being none
between being national-socialist and being non-aryan
existed so deeply so clearly
that you could trace the hands - between them, i.e. the physical contact - the exchange the giving and the receiving of answers
and the plight
the suffering
Both is deeply interwoven in my family’s network even when there are still lots of people denying something like a network existed.
The denial. of "what "we" are " isolates me and makes my words ILLISIBLE
This kind of isolation also constitutes me as a subject paradoxically (translating mischievously Judith Butler - her differentiation would be helpful- but I can't work with her words If I am trying to cite or quote her, my computer is getting attacked and everything is lost
So instead all I could do was think about the denial
the BLUR
and by doing so I have to follow the line of censorship even with all wrong torsions and other possible distortion popping up at every moment. Hate has come to know fascists better than they do themselves the shitty interaction via Computer can restart every day on point zero because hate hasn't enregistered any response at all, finally there is non and will never be: Fascists will always stand OUTside reasoning
every reason you might produce fades into nothing, creating a feeling of helplessness similar to speaking/connecting with someone suffering Alzheimer disease...
Even if my words my research
is about Rudolf Hess or Hönigswald
The Führer’s Substitute or the Jewish philosopher
Martin Heidegger or Karl Haushofer
The German philosopher and the German Geopolitician married to Martha Haushofer
Thinking about the difficult situation of Karl and Albrecht Haushofer
their urgent tipping POint in 1940 1939 or 1941…
Then Ascher or Cohen : The German professor after the war mayor or the Jewish philosopher, dead in 1918.
Thinking about The NAUMANN Juden , the paradoxical Jewish national-socialist Mouvcement
or even the teacher of Anne Frank
the director of the Montessorian association Jewish descent leading the organization from the Netherland’s underground
Is a perilous act.
In every moment a kind of deep fake masochism intruding disfiguring my words my thoughts
T#es qu'une merde
Transforming Subjects
Of course, the idea of Germans being tortured for being revolutionary is historically speaking hilarious
The idea of a German combattant for the African cause could only be a blurred
phony preposterous Phainomenon. Self-indulgent biased and in the long run serving nothing else than a mobile for jurisdictional prosecution:
Dying a horrible death in a KZ - a concentration camp is what a German missionary deserved.
Even if I were to talk about anticolonialism and anti-imperialist movements BEFORE 1933, the blur of Historical truth would wash out everything compared to African suffering compared to the Jewish Holocaust
Yet -it is not possible to speak of Comparison.
Whatever I could know - possibly know about German geopoliticians
from Rohrbach to Haushofer - and their possible connection to German philosophers form Husserl to Heidegger from Cassirer to Scheler.
Via my personal historical background was broken by the fact of being
OUTSIDE History.
(…my words have to be broken and even if I would dare to say the same as Masha Gessen I have to be erased in my own words.
Calling my self mad - as in Judith Butler analysis of Foucault (“The wrong doing - telling the truth”) does it constitue a kind of legitimation of our mutual discourse ? )
I doubt it, because the signs of concentration camps still are MORE Valuable than anything else and I have here some of those horrible items in my possession, taken out of time and history.
They look like a magical tool… taken out of time and suffering
The blurring - the devaluation is affecting the concept… of personality and or identity
Working on Hildegard Fath, the Führer’s substitute secretary, and what she could have known
Is affecting me: Writing about her makes me identical to her.
The German Heimtückegesetz here fits well:
HERE all of them have to be considered as WAR Criminals - everybody is entitled to write this on my wall.
Thats great. (But, hate - I would like to say if you let me speak at least once- you have omitted to think about devaluation - if you violate me, you're violating the access point to your own main argument.)
Denigration my research by using Deepfake
The Deepfae of being unhuman.
One of the main objections accusation against Germans , and especially in my case, against the members of my family
relies upon their presumed incapacity to see (in every day life)
to notice the suffering of others. But, The Suffering of THE Other
Is part of the invisible frontline, written in the institutional process of the New national-Socialist State
The frontline between someone creating the institutional frame
Of putting parts of the population out of the legal system
Represents also the line to knowledge and the possibility to look for solidarity.
Both is LINKED even in the process of creating a kind of legalized annihilation.
In Philosophical writing, THE OTHER is sometimes
Only sometimes -
To be found under the name of the “NON-I"
Something which I, Nataly, compare to negative conceptions Of the “I”
Declining also The Self, Selfhood, or anything
Ascribable to a subject
Which could mean: easier to handle, to deal with, perhaps.
Negative Moments of Subjects
is one of the Family topics. From Hermann Ritzel to Edmund Husserl bis Brentano
Then there must be is some possibility to talk about double-faced personalities
as Haushofer, Martha and Karl and Albrecht
(I often heard hate say:
Cannot trust any one of them
there are no innocents on the right side of the river Rhine
as there is no innocent person in Gaza…)
Being non-aryan or non-german constitutes not a single opposition, it breeds multiple choices.
But in my case and I have to say it, It comes near to STIGMaTA
Being a SLUT rien qu’une merde
Something lesser than a mentally ill person and something quite worse:
I have to say it, because, if I don’t do it, I can be sure the next website is taken down. Words destroyed texts disappearing
Social devaluation is part of the process.
Thinking about nonhumans and those people without values
being genetically evil or born with indelibile hatred, with hate in DNA
As it is written TODAY AGAIN In the newspaper world
let me look at today's military enclosures.
The usefulness of medical services for military intelligence.
( I think one can notice the fraccassed broken imagery of PURETY from medical care, linked to genetically rotten biases…. Makes the most minimal (which seems to be the most expensive of all manners) humanitarian ground simply a tool for military purposes…
It is NOT hilarious
to pretend, there is a necessity for research about German war criminals and simultaneously to find it consequential and logically right to humiliate the research about the biography and deeds of war criminals.
BUT taken the question seriously
If by any chance I could know something about fascist structures and fascist philosophy, I then should be able to narrate or demonstrate what I had learned about them, I should be able to tell what exactly I knew about ordinary Germans and what exactly a fascist KNEW about concentration camps and what I saw of it in an institutional frame…HERe The first CONDITION of being a fascist should be fulfilled
so -
YES or NO
Do I have this knowledge or not ?
I should KNOW, from the time my grandfather was 20 years old in 1933, what he had known and I should even be able to trace his knowledge to other persons
But as an outsider, subject and object
To notneutral interventions, active and passive
as fascist I don't have the right to complain. Nor do I have the right to suffer with those kept in under human circumstances. SOLIDARITY does not exist
To continue my work as somebody intrinsically implicated and excluded
even If I wanted to "reflect". (If there is anything like a processing or reflecting process of anything like a trauma or any kind of trauma education) on family members and their "exposition" to KZs
by establishing a documentation about my historical materials, by using the abundant literature about and from survivors as Bruno Bettelheim, Jean Améry Simone WEill Simone Veil, Primo Levi, Imre Kertesz, Nelly Sutro, Helen Czapski-Holtzmann , Isaak Katzennelson (W. Biermann translated) Norman Frister, G.Didier Hubermann / Ringelblum Archiv Warschaer Ghetto archives…or Kounio or
(Many of those books my grandmother gave me to read, and grandfather the fascist philosopher wrote about them…)
the question remains
is there any possibility to THINK about the mechanism. of elimination
Is there any possibility to think and to "CALCULATE" chances techniques means ways orders systems of elimination?
AND The most disturbing question: is there any possibility of a conclusion to be made by an observer who is NOT OUTSIDE the situation but concerned ?
BUT INSIDE...
Bruno Bettelheim was one of those who have cleared the ground for this question to be asked..
Measurements of annihilation
based on comparison, using mathematics in a kind of existential design
And subjects are part of the calculation - beings even when they are but unseen, invisible.
and is still - to quote some of the most famous parts of Bruno Bettelheim's book "Aufstand gegen die Masse" a possibility to survive.
(( But Bettelheims pedagogical development is itself authoritarian (say wellinformed critics) and by consequences to be disposed off.))
The idea of punishment and the problem of subjects being based outside any forms of legal protection or denied any form of sustainability even in their most basic needs
relies still on the concept of a subject...not only of the concept of being an enemy.
- if subject and sustainability have any significance in determining what a "subject" looks like which is, perhaps, a pure philosophical linguistic grammarly question ( to use some .....Lancanian... some .... Cohenian..... words....?) The question what a "subject" constitutes has extremely political consequences and defines a living being in any existential circumstances..
I cannot see nor understand why destroying this analysis
and silencing authors, writers thinkers is considered to be the new decent way of making philosophy.
Even when I am talking about GUILT. Even a destroyed enemy does not create a heideggerian ground of theological existence.
The problem in the incongruity of terrestrial concepts of religion
metaphysical concepts mixed with new forms of interpreting space
creates new double binds
And I, as a slut as a mentally destroyed person without any solidarity and support could find interesting in analyzing in order to help understanding
why the politics of collective punishments have created only a kind of double background.
The book heftarot
17 Jitro
Jeschajahu 6,1 - 7,6 and 9,5-6
sephardisch 6,1-13